Our extract was a 3-minute clip of
the movie 24. In it the author uses a pretty shady interrogation to portray his
theme. His theme was that violence is not the answer and its best to solve
things in order. Using violence makes you just as bad as them. This is better
represented by the editing, camera usage, sound, and Mis en scene of the movie.
These techniques help make the theme clearer and helps develop theme. I will
explain these techniques and the way they are used as they are presented
chronologically in the movie due to there being one scene.
All of
these happen near the beginning or right as it starts continuing throughout the
rest of the extract. Firstly, this theme is supported by their dialogue which
is the first we hear. The way they speak to each other is strange as he walks
in with a very hostile tone. Even so she keeps calm and doesn’t crack under
pressure though he’s yelling and screaming at her. This shows that no matter
how violent you are it is not the way to solve things he got nothing from
screaming and got nowhere. Next thing you see is the use of no tripod the
camera is shaking. What this does is reflect his anger and the tension through
the camera’s movements. This develops the fact that he truly is violent and
angry showing that things get really heated and as he gets angry the camera
starts shaking. But even though nothing was gained. At the same time this is
happening you here the score. The score gives off the feeling of tension
between the two. It helps you see the disconnect between this two showing his
anger through the use of eerie tone while also being quiet and calm like her.
This disconnect helps show how the tension builds and how throughout all his
attempts nothing worked. With the ending of the score sounding very low in bass
showing that his actions were wrong. At the same time, you also see the actors.
The way that he shows his emotions using speech and facial expressions shows
his anger and violent intent. But even with all the pressure put onto her
nothing happened. All of these happen near the beginning and show that through
the use of emotion what he did was wrong and wasn’t the way to approach the
situation.
Throughout
the actual footage that we were shown a lot of things happened. All of these
are events that occur presented in chronological order. First thing that
happens is the flipping of the table. The use of this prop shows his anger. The
way he flips it over and the way it bangs on the ground shows how mad he was.
Now this approach to interrogating is a very violent approach in which nothing
was gained. This develops the idea that no matter how violent you are not
everything can be solved that way. Next that happens is a crosscut showing the
people outside and how surprised they are and uneasy about what just happened.
The woman looks panicked while the man looks concerned. This builds off the
fact that this isn’t the usual approach and isn’t what they wanted. By the way
they acted it can be said that what he’s doing is morally wrong. This builds
off the fact that you are just as bad as them if you solve manners through
violence. Next, he pushes her against a wall which gives us a high angle of
what’s happening. This angle is like a metaphor saying that this is the peak
and the extent that he goes will go to for justice. This develops the idea that
he doesn’t hold morals to heart and will do anything to get what he wants even
violence. Especially when compared to the scene where he’s choking her. His
violence did nothing no matter what lengths he took. And lastly it shows the
reaction of those watching outside with a split away shot. This shot shows
their panic and them running to her assistance. This shows that what he did was
wrong with people rushing to stop the situation. Which develops the idea that
this shouldn’t be the way to solve problems a nonviolent approach is best. All
of these points use the events and actions taken as ways to help the theme.
Showing that being incredibly violent gets you no where but in trouble as in
the end he was taken away and ended the interrogation all it did was set them
back.
All the
use of camera angles which are high angles, and the use of no tripod. The use
of editing is cross cuts and split away. The use of sound is dialogue and
score. And the use of mis-en-scene is props and actors. The use of all these
techniques help develop one theme that violence is not then answer and its best
to settle things through peace. They each show that no matter how violent and
angry he was nothing was accomplished. Instead all his violent approach did was
set them back now they have less time and he’s going to be int trouble with
higher ups for laying hands on the suspect. It got them nowhere. All of this
shows that the theme is definitely this or is closely related to this.